Confirm favorite deletion?
Business Organizations Keyed to Sjostrom
GreenHunter Energy, Inc. v. Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc.
Citation:337 P.3d 454 (Wyo. 2014)
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
In 2009, appellee Western and the LLC entered into a contract whereby Western undertook to provide the LLC consulting services related to the potential development of a wind turbine farm. While Western performed under the contract, the LLC paid nothing for Western’s services. The district court granted judgment in favor of Western. After learning that it could not collect on its judgments against the LLC, Western brought this action against appellant, the sole member of the LLC, seeking to pierce the LLC’s veil and hold appellant liable for the LLC’s contractual obligations. At trial, Western was able to prove that the LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of appellant, the latter being the sole member and manager of the former. The LLC consistently carried on operating capital balance which was insufficient to cover its debts. Western showed that appellant decided when and how much money to advance to the LLC to allow it to its accounts payable.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.