Confirm favorite deletion?
Business Organizations Keyed to Allen
Goodwin v. Agassiz
Citation:186 N.E. 659 (Mass. 1933).
Agassiz was the president and director of Cliff Mining Company. MacNaughton was the general manager and a director. Both were also directors for another mining company. In 1925, exploration began on Cliff Mining Company property. Exploration ended in May 1926, resulting in a theory that there were copper deposits. Defendants did not want adjacent property owners to learn about the geologist’s theory for fear they may have difficulty securing options on those lands if they chose to pursue. An article on May 14, 1926 reported that exploration operations had ended on the Cliff Mining Company property. Plaintiff read said article and immediately sold his shares of stock through brokers which were then bought by defendants brokers.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.