Confirm favorite deletion?
Business Organizations Keyed to Bouchoux
Goldstein v. Pikus
Citation:2015 N.Y.Slip Op. 31455(U) (2015)
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
These actions arise out of the ongoing disputes between Stuart D. Goldstein and Jeffrey S. Pikus, the two managers of Ten Sheridan Associates, LLC. On December 10, 1996, Pikus formed the company to serve as a vehicle for a mixed-used apartment building located at 10 Sheridan Square in Manhattan. In order to complete the purchase of the property, the company needed to obtain additional funds and investors. Pikus and Goldstein were introduced, and Goldstein agreed to try to procure investors. They entered into the Syndication Agreement, under which the parties agreed that they would attempt to syndicate up to 50% of the company. Defendants alleged that as a result of the disagreements that have since arisen between the two managers, Goldstein took actions that effectively froze Pikus out of the management of the property.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.