SmartBrief
0
Confirm favorite deletion?
Administrative Law Keyed to Cass
Goldberg v. Kelly
Citation:
397 U.S. 254 (1970)Facts
The plaintiffs were recipients of federally assisted public assistance in New York, including Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) and New York State’s general Home Relief program. Their benefits were terminated without prior notice and without opportunity for a hearing to contest the termination. New York’s procedure allowed for a post-termination “fair hearing,” but recipients could be without benefits for months before such a hearing. The plaintiffs brought a class action suit challenging this procedure as violating due process, arguing that welfare benefits were a statutory entitlement that could not be arbitrarily terminated without procedural safeguards. The state defended its procedures as adequate and argued that additional procedural requirements would impose fiscal and administrative burdens.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.