SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Business Planning Keyed to Reed
Genzyme Corp. v. Bishop
Citation:
460 F. Supp. 2d 939 (2006)Facts
Genzyme Corporation, a biotechnology company, acquired Bone Care International, a company specializing in Vitamin D products, in July 2005. The individual defendants, Charles Bishop, Keith Crawford, and Eric Messner, were high-level executives at Bone Care who had signed Employee Agreements containing various restrictive covenants, including a covenant not to compete, a rights to intellectual property provision, and a return of company property provision. After the acquisition, all three executives terminated their employment with Bone Care/Genzyme in July and August 2005. In September 2005, they formed Proventiv Therapeutics LLC, which also specialized in Vitamin D products. In June 2006, they sold Proventiv to Cytochroma, a Canadian corporation, partly for its drug pipeline and patent applications covering new Vitamin D uses. Genzyme filed suit alleging the defendants breached their employment agreements, misappropriated confidential information, breached their fiduciary duties, usurped corporate opportunities, and engaged in conspiracy. The defendants moved to dismiss several counts, arguing that the restrictive covenants were overbroad and unenforceable, and that the tort claims were preempted by the Wisconsin Uniform Trade Secrets Act.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.