SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Torts Keyed to Miller
Galanti v. United States
Citation:
709 F.2d 706 (1983)Facts
Vivian Galanti’s (Plaintiff) husband, Isaac, was shot to death while he was inspecting a property that belonged to a man named Roger Underhill. Underhill was a key government witness in a government investigation of a convicted felon and fugitive. Underhill had been in frequent contact with Paul King, Jr., the FBI Agent in charge of the investigation. King was aware that several earlier attempts were made by Thevis to have Underhill murdered. King considered Underhill to be in a danger and arranged for him to enter a witness protection program. However, Underhill refused to enter the program until he was able to sell the property in Fulton County and continued to visit the property despite King’s warnings. On the night before the murders, Underhill called King and told him he would be showing the property the next day to Galanti, who had responded to his newspaper ad about the property. However, King made no effort to contact and or warn Galanti of the potential danger and he did not arrange for surveillance of the property that day. Galanti sued the United States for negligence.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.