SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Antitrust Keyed to Sullivan, 8th Ed.
FTC v. Staples, Inc. and Office Depot, Inc.
Citation:
190 F. Supp. 3d 100 (2016)Facts
Staples and Office Depot, the two largest office supply vendors in the United States, announced their intent to merge in February 2015, with Staples proposing to acquire Office Depot for $6.3 billion. The Federal Trade Commission conducted an extensive year-long investigation involving over fifteen million pages of documents, more than seventy depositions, and five expert reports. The investigation focused on the market for sale and distribution of consumable office supplies to large business-to-business customers, defined as companies spending $500,000 or more annually on office supplies, encompassing approximately 1,200 corporations nationwide. Evidence showed that Staples captured 47.3 percent and Office Depot captured 31.6 percent of this market, totaling seventy-nine percent combined market share. Large business customers typically engage in competitive Request for Proposal processes to establish multi-year contracts with primary vendors, receiving prices approximately half those paid by average retail consumers, along with value-added services including sophisticated information technology capabilities, dedicated customer service, nationwide desktop delivery, and detailed utilization reporting. The defendants consistently competed head-to-head for these contracts, with seventy-eight percent of Office Depot’s bid losses going to Staples and eighty-one percent of Staples’ bid losses going to Office Depot. Defendants argued that Amazon Business and regional competitors like WB Mason would replace any competition lost through the merger, but the evidence showed Amazon Business had never won a primary vendor contract despite fourteen years in the office supply business, lacked experience with the RFP process, could not guarantee pricing due to its marketplace model with independent third-party sellers, and projected only a small market share by 2020.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.