SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Antitrust Keyed to Morgan, 7th Ed.
Federal Trade Commission v. Whole Foods Market, Inc.
Citation:
548 F.3d 1028 (2008)Facts
Whole Foods Market, Inc. and Wild Oats Markets, Inc. operated 194 and 110 grocery stores respectively, primarily in the United States, focusing on natural and organic products. In February 2007, they announced that Whole Foods would acquire Wild Oats in a $565 million transaction. The FTC investigated and sought a preliminary injunction to block the merger, arguing that Whole Foods and Wild Oats were the two largest operators of “premium natural and organic supermarkets” (PNOS), and in eighteen cities, the merger would create monopolies. The FTC presented evidence including emails from Whole Foods CEO John Mackey suggesting the purpose of the merger was to eliminate a competitor, expert economic analysis showing how entry by various supermarkets affected sales, and evidence of price effects when PNOS competitors entered markets. Whole Foods countered that it competed within the broader market of all supermarkets, not just PNOS, and presented expert testimony that a hypothetical monopolist could not raise prices without driving customers to other supermarkets. The district court denied the preliminary injunction, finding that PNOS was not a distinct market. While the appeal was pending, Whole Foods completed the acquisition of Wild Oats and began integrating the companies.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.