SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Frier
Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v Gulf Oil Corp.
Citation:
415 F. Supp. 429 (S.D. Fla. 1975)Facts
Defendant and Plaintiff had an executed agreement under which Defendant was to provide jet fuel to Plaintiff. The agreement was drafted by Defendant but negotiated extensively by both parties to reflect their longstanding business relationship. The contract provided that Plaintiff would purchase from Defendant any jet fuel it needed in certain cities. In turn, Defendant would make the necessary arrangements to satisfy Plaintiff’s reasonable, good-faith jet-fuel needs in those cities. The contract also provided that payment would be calculated according to a price escalation provision tied to postings in Platt’s Oilgram Crude Oil Supplement. During the period of energy crises in 1973 and 1974, Defendant repudiated its contract with Plaintiff.
Plaintiff sued Defendant for breach of contract, seeking injunctive relief that requires specific performance of the contract. In defending against an action for breach of contract, Defendant alleged that the contract was not binding because it lacked mutuality of obligation and that Eastern had breached the contract by fuel freighting in which Plaintiff took on more or less fuel at certain Defendant’s stations, regardless of actual operating requirements, depending on the relative prices at the stations. Defendant also alleged that its performance under the contract had become commercially impracticable for two reasons: (1) the price escalation provision that tied payment to Platt’s no longer represented the intent of the parties because of a two-tier pricing model imposed by the government, and (2) the worldwide oil shortage caused substantial increases in crude oil prices, and there was no corresponding increase in the escalation clause. Plaintiff still contended that it was entitled to specific performance because both parties knew an embargo was imminent, and they had tied the contract price to domestic postings in an oil publication. The record at trial also showed that Defendant’s profits went up proportionally to the cost of foreign oil in the 1973-1974 period, and in fact, Defendant’s 1974 profits exceeded 1973 profits. Nor did Defendant’s evidence of increased costs demonstrate hardship since the costs it proved were related to transfer pricing–the costs associated with intra-company costs of moving goods from one segment of the corporation to another. The record also showed that Defendant executives were in close contact with government policy makers preceding imposition of the new pricing policies.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.