SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Regulatory Law Keyed to Shapiro, 4th Ed.
Duquesne Light Company v. Barasch
Citation:
488 U.S. 299 (1989)Facts
In 1967, Duquesne Light Company and Pennsylvania Power Company joined a venture called the Central Area Power Coordination Group (CAPCO) to build seven large nuclear generating units in response to predictions of increased electricity demand. By 1980, the utilities canceled plans for four of these plants due to intervening events, including the Arab oil embargo and the Three Mile Island accident, which dramatically changed the outlook for electricity demand and nuclear energy. At the time of cancellation, Duquesne had invested approximately $35 million and Penn Power had invested about $9.6 million in preliminary construction costs for the canceled plants. The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission initially allowed the utilities to recover these costs through amortization over a 10-year period, finding that the utilities’ decisions were “reasonable and prudent.” However, in December 1982, Pennsylvania enacted Act 335, which prohibited including the costs of facilities not “used and useful in service to the public” in utility rates. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court interpreted this law to prohibit recovery of the canceled plant costs either through inclusion in the rate base or through amortization, rejecting the utilities’ constitutional challenge to the statute.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.