Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Templin
DiFolco v. MSNBC
Citation:831 F.Supp.2d 634 (2011)
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Claudia DiFolco (plaintiff) entered into a two-year contract with MSNBC (defendant) to work as a correspondent. The plaintiff alleges that despite performing all of her professional obligations in an exemplary manner, she was subjected to intolerable working conditions and concerted efforts to damage her reputation and career by her producers. On August 23, the plaintiff emailed the defendant’s president requesting a meeting to discuss her exit from the show. The president agreed to this meeting, but alleges that he believed the plaintiff had resigned. The plaintiff sent a second email clarifying that she was not resigning, but was subsequently sent a proposed separation and severance agreement. The plaintiff sued for, among other things, breach of contract and defamation. The defendant moved for summary judgment.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.