Confirm favorite deletion?
Criminal Procedure Keyed to Dressler
Davis v. United States
Citation:564 U.S. 229, 131 S.Ct. 2419, 180 L.Ed.2d 285.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
The defendant was a passenger in a car that was pulled over for a routine traffic stop. The driver was intoxicated. The defendant gave a false name to the police and he and the driver ended up being arrested. The officers searched the car and the passenger compartment pursuant to the Fourth Amendment law set out in Belton v. New York. They found a firearm belonging to the defendant that he was not permitted to possess.
The defendant was convicted after a trial. He appealed, and while the case was pending, the Supreme Court decided Arizona v. Gant, which adopted a new rule relating to the searches of automobiles. The Eleventh Circuit held that under Gant, the search was unconstitutional. However, the court refused to apply the exclusionary rule to the unconstitutional search and affirmed the conviction.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.