Confirm favorite deletion?
Evidence Keyed to Sklansky
Crawford v. Washington
Citation:541 U.S. 36 (2004)
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
An individual was stabbed at his apartment. The defendant was arrested. The police then questioned the defendant and his wife. The defendant eventually confessed that he and his wife had gone to search for the victim because the victim had tried to rape his wife. The defendant claimed that the couple went to the victims house and a fight ensued. The defendant’s wife generally corroborated the defendant’s story but there were some inconsistencies. The questioning of the wife was recorded.
The defendant was charged and prosecuted with assault and attempted murder. The defendant claimed self-defense. The wife did not testify. The prosecution sought to introduce the wife’s recorded statement at trial. The defendant claimed that the recordings violated the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. The trial court admitted the recordings. The defendant was convicted.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.