Confirm favorite deletion?
Criminal Law keyed to Dripps
Cooper v. United States
Facts
Leon Cooper (Defendant) and his brother Robert Parker lived with their mother, Alice Cooper. After Parker had returned home from unexpectedly being away for ten days, the two brothers began arguing about where Parker had gone. The argument escalated and Parker hit Defendant in the head with a small radio. Mrs. Cooper ran upstairs to call for help when she heard a “pop.” She went back downstairs and saw Parker lying on the floor. Defendant admitted to shooting him and Parker subsequently died. Defendant was charged with voluntary manslaughter while armed and carrying a pistol without a license. At trial, Defendant’s counsel objected to the trial court giving the standard jury instruction when a defendant claims self-defense. That instruction, 5.16B, states in part: “[i]f the defendant could have safely retreated but did not do so, his failure to retreat is a circumstance which you may consider together with all the other circumstances in determining whether he went further in repelling the danger, real or apparent, then he was justified in doing so under the circumstances. Before a person can avail himself [of] . . . self-defense against a charge of homicide, he must do everything in his power, consistent with his own safety, to avoid the danger and avoid the necessity of taking life . . . If the defendant actually believed that he was in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm, and that deadly force was necessary to repel such danger, he was not required to retreat . . . He was entitled to stand his ground and use such force as was reasonably necessary under the circumstances to save his life or protect himself from serious bodily harm.” The trial court overruled Defendant’s objection to the instruction and he was convicted. Defendant appealed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.