StudyBuddy Pro
  • Law Study Aids
    • Case Briefs
    • Lessons
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
      • 2L/3L
        • Business Organizations & Associations
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence
        • Family Law
        • Secured Transactions
        • Wills, Trusts & Estates
    • Outlines
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
      • 2L/3L
        • Agency
        • Business Organizations & Associations
        • Conflicts of Law
        • Corporations
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence
        • Family Law
        • Intellectual Property
        • Partnerships
        • Secured Transactions
      • Exam Prep Checklists
        • Access 1L Checklists
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • Access 2L/3L Checklists
          • Agency
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Corporations/Business Entities
          • Evidence
          • Family Law
          • Partnership
          • Trusts
          • U.C.C. ART. 9
          • Wills
    • Refresher Courses
      • 1L
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts Law
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts Law
      • 2L/3L
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence Law
    • Exam Prep Pro
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
      • 2L/3L
        • Business Organizations & Associations
        • Conflicts of Law
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence
        • Family Law
        • Secured Transactions
        • Wills, Trusts & Estates
    • Multiple Choice Quizzes
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
      • 2L/3L
        • Business Organizations & Associations
        • Conflicts of Law
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence
        • Family Law
        • Secured Transactions
        • Wills, Trusts & Estates
    • Exam Prep Workshops
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
    • Charts and Notes
      • 1L
        • Civil Procedure
        • Constitutional Law
        • Contracts
        • Criminal Law
        • Property Law
        • Torts
      • 2L/3L
        • Criminal Procedure
        • Evidence
  • Courses
    • 1L Prep Course
  • Solutions
    • Professors and Institutions
    Generic selectors
    Exact matches only
    Search in title
    Search in content
    Post Type Selectors
    Advanced Search | Notes Search
    Start My FREE 7-DAY Trial
    Log In
    StuddyBuddy Pro
    Apple
    Facebook
    Google

    Forgot Password?

    Forgot Password?

    Forgotten Password

    Cancel

    Generic selectors
    Exact matches only
    Search in title
    Search in content
    Post Type Selectors

    • Law Study Aids
      • Case Briefs
      • Lessons
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • 2L/3L
          • Business Organizations & Associations
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence
          • Family Law
          • Secured Transactions
          • Wills, Trusts & Estates
      • Outlines
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • 2L/3L
          • Agency
          • Business Organizations & Associations
          • Conflicts of Law
          • Corporations
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence
          • Family Law
          • Intellectual Property
          • Partnerships
          • Secured Transactions
        • Exam Prep Checklists
          • Access 1L Checklists
            • Civil Procedure
            • Constitutional Law
            • Contracts
            • Criminal Law
            • Property Law
            • Torts
          • Access 2L/3L Checklists
            • Agency
            • Criminal Procedure
            • Corporations/Business Entities
            • Evidence
            • Family Law
            • Partnership
            • Trusts
            • U.C.C. ART. 9
            • Wills
      • Refresher Courses
        • 1L
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts Law
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts Law
        • 2L/3L
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence Law
      • Exam Prep Pro
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • 2L/3L
          • Business Organizations & Associations
          • Conflicts of Law
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence
          • Family Law
          • Secured Transactions
          • Wills, Trusts & Estates
      • Multiple Choice Quizzes
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • 2L/3L
          • Business Organizations & Associations
          • Conflicts of Law
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence
          • Family Law
          • Secured Transactions
          • Wills, Trusts & Estates
      • Exam Prep Workshops
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
      • Charts and Notes
        • 1L
          • Civil Procedure
          • Constitutional Law
          • Contracts
          • Criminal Law
          • Property Law
          • Torts
        • 2L/3L
          • Criminal Procedure
          • Evidence
    • Courses
      • 1L Prep Course
    • Solutions
      • Professors and Institutions
    Start My FREE 7-DAY Trial
    Log In Sign up
    StuddyBuddy Pro
    Apple
    Facebook
    Google

    Forgot Password?

    Forgot Password?

    Forgotten Password

    Cancel
    SmartBrief enables case brief popups that define Key Terms, Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises used in this case.

    SmartBrief

    A.I Enhanced Margin Brief to quickly recall case brief A.I Enhanced Margin Brief to quickly recall case brief 0

    Sections to print





    To print, please Start a Free Trial or Log in.

    Confirm favorite deletion?

    Cancel Yes, Delete

    Criminal Law Keyed to Kennedy

    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Robert A. Berkowitz

    Citation:

    415 Pa.Super. 505 (1992)
    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.

    Facts

    Defendant and the victim were both college sophomores at East Stroudsburg State University. On April 19, 1988, the victim planned to meet her boyfriend at the dormitory which Defendant also lived in. She drank a martini to “loosen up a bit.” When her boyfriend didn’t come, the victim went to a dorm that Defendant and Hassel shared. Hassel was not there, but Defendant was. The victim wrote a note for him that said she was drunk. She testified that although she had not felt any intoxicating effects, she wrote the note “for a laugh.”

    Before the victim could leave defendant’s room, defendant asked her to stay and “hang out for a while.” She complied because she “had time to kill” and because she didn’t really know defendant and wanted to give him “a fair chance.” The victim sat on the floor, and according to the victim, defendant joined her and began kissing her. The victim said no, but defendant ignored her and started to fondle her. He then attempted to have her perform oral sex on him. The victim said no many times, but did not physically resist. Defendant got up to lock the door, and then put her down on the bed. They had sexual intercourse. She did not scream at any time because “it felt like a dream was happening or something.” The victim did softly say no to him.

    Immediately after, defendant said, “Wow, I guess we just got carried away.” The victim responded, “no, we didn’t get carried away, you got carried away.” She quickly got dressed and left. Once downstairs, she started crying and contacted the police.

    At trial, defendant testified that while the victim said no, he believed it to be passionate moaning. He was convicted of rape.

    Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*

    Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.

    *Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue

    • The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
    • Topic:

      Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
    • Parties:

      Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
    • Procedural Posture & History:

      Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
    • Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:

      A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
    • Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:

      Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.
    • The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
    • Brief Facts:

      A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
    • Rule of Law:

      Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
    • Facts:

      What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
    • Issue(s):

      Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
    • Holding:

      Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
    • Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:

      Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
    • Reasoning and Analysis:

      Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.
    • The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
    • Policy:

      Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
    • Court Direction:

      Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.

    Case Quiz

    Retake Attempts
    Question 1 of 3

    Results

    0 of 3 Questions answered correctly.

    Results

    Quiz complete. Results are being recorded.
    Q.1 - Doctrinally, how does Commonwealth v. Berkowitz structure the relationship between “lack of consent” and “forcible compulsion” under 18 Pa.C.S. § 3121?
    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because the Court’s entire holding depends on rejecting the idea that non-consent and compulsion are coextensive.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because the Court treats “forcible compulsion” as narrower and more demanding than mere non-consent, not broader.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because lack of consent is not treated as an aggravator but as part of the baseline wrong, with forcible compulsion as a separate, required element.
    Correct! This is correct because the Court explicitly requires “forcible compulsion” as an independent statutory element that cannot be satisfied merely by demonstrating non-consent, however clear or emphatic. This constructs a two-tier structure in which lack of consent is necessary but not sufficient for rape, reserving the label of “forcible” for cases with additional force, threats, or objectively coercive circumstances.
    Q.2 - What is the most precise account of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s allocation of fact-finding and law-declaring authority in reversing the rape conviction but reinstating indecent assault in Berkowitz?
    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because the Court did not defer to the jury on whether the legal element of compulsion was satisfied—it overrode that conclusion.
    Correct! This is correct because the Court accepted the jury’s factual findings (including that intercourse occurred and that the complainant did not consent) but concluded, as a matter of legal sufficiency, that those facts could not meet the statutory standard for “forcible compulsion,” while still supporting indecent assault. This reflects a division of labor in which juries find historical facts and appellate courts determine whether those facts, taken as true, fit the elements of the charged offense.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because the Court did not disturb witness credibility; it assumed the complainant’s account and still found the evidence legally insufficient for rape.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because the Court’s reinstatement of indecent assault shows it did not adopt a rule that the failure of forcible compulsion collapses all lesser sexual offenses.
    Q.3 - Conceptually, how does Berkowitz most accurately define the evidentiary threshold for “forcible compulsion” in the context of a confined, locked-room sexual encounter with repeated verbal refusals?
    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.
    Correct! This is correct because Berkowitz insists on additional, objectively discernible manifestations of force or threat—beyond the locked door, verbal refusals, and emotional distress—to meet “forcible compulsion,” thereby elevating the evidentiary threshold above non-consensual sex in a confined setting. The Court treats confinement and verbal “no” as evidencing non-consent and discomfort but not, without more, the kind of compulsion the statute demands.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because the Court explicitly refused to treat confinement and isolation alone as implied threats sufficient to constitute force.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because subjective fear and emotional paralysis, standing alone, were held inadequate to constitute forcible compulsion under the statute.
    Incorrect. This is wrong because the Court rejected any presumption of compulsion based on privacy plus later regret; it demanded concrete proof of coercive conduct.

    MarginBrief™ Case overview for optimal recall

    A.I Enhanced Margin Brief to quickly recall case brief
    A.I Enhanced Margin Brief to quickly recall case brief

    Generating...

    Facts:

    Quickly review the Facts of this case including its key ideas for optimal understanding and recall.

    Quickly review the Facts of this case including its key ideas for optimal understanding and recall.

    Issue:

    Utilize our powerful A.I. tools to easily capture and understand the Issue in this case.

    Utilize our powerful A.I. tools to easily capture and understand the Issue in this case.

    Rule:

    Easily understand the Rule in this case so you have a complete and thorough appreciation for overall case concepts completely tying together what occurred, the court’s questions and the case outcome.

    Easily understand the Rule in this case so you have a complete and thorough appreciation for overall case concepts completely tying together what occurred, the court’s questions and the case outcome.

    Start Your Free Trial or Log in.

    Topic Resources

    ™ CaseCast

    Scott Caron

    ProfessorScott Caron

    CaseCast™ "What you need to know"

    CaseCast™ –  "What you need to know"

    play_circle_filled
    pause_circle_filled
    Commonwealth v. Berkowitz
    volume_down
    volume_up
    volume_off
    To continue listening to this CaseCast™ please Subscribe

    Topic Video

    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Robert A. Berkowitz3m 19s
    See complete Lesson, Quizzes and More

    Topic Outline

    Elements of a Crime

    Status:

    Your Law School
    Success Begins Here

    • Case Briefs - the Socratic Savior! – Best in class and Largest Library of complete I.R.A.C. / C.R.E.A.C. Law School case briefs. Includes:
      • SmartBriefs® - Enhanced case briefs for optimal clarity
      • New Case Videos - Explained and Summarized for optimal case understanding
      • CaseCast® - Professor overviews of "What you need to know"
      • New MarginBrief® - A.I. - Powered for faster, more efficient case recall
    • Lessons - Professor delivered video for topic reinforcement
    • Outlines - Professor written - downloadable, amendable and includes test-taking tips and tools
    • New Case Quiz - Reinforce case principles, instantly scored
    • Refresher Courses - Quick course reviews with interactive exercises
    • Quizzes and Exams - over 5,000 Multiple Choice and Essay questions all Professor curated and answered
    • New My Reviewer™ - Instantly receive a Score, Critique and Feedback on your legal writing
    • Exam Prep Workshops - Delivered by Professors on how to disect, organize and answer law school exam questions
    • and so much more ...
    Start your FREE Trial

    Notepad Click anywhere in notepad to add a note

    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Robert A. Berkowitz