Confirm favorite deletion?
Constitutional Law Keyed to Feldman
Clinton v. Jones
Citation:520 U.S. 681 (1997)
Petitioner, William Jefferson Clinton, was elected to the Presidency in 1992 and re-elected in 1996. In 1991, he was the Governor of the State of Arkansas. On 1994, the respondent commenced this action by filing a complaint naming petitioner as a defendant. The respondent alleged that Clinton while he was the Governor made abhorrent sexual advances which she rejected. She also said that Clinton dealt with her in a hostile and rude manner and changed her duties to punish her for rejecting those advances. The alleged misconduct was unrelated to any of his official duties as President of the U.S and occurred before he was elected to the office.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.