SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Torts Keyed to Franklin
Centocor, Inc. v. Hamilton
Citation:
372 S.W.3d 140 (2012)Facts
Patricia Hamilton had a complex medical history, including Crohn’s disease, recurring joint pain, and arthritis. In 2001, she experienced a flare in her Crohn’s disease and sought treatment from Dr. Hauptman, a gastroenterologist. Based on her condition and limited treatment options, Dr. Hauptman prescribed Remicade, a relatively new immunomodulator medication manufactured by Centocor. Patricia received her Remicade infusions at Dr. Bullen’s infusion clinic. During her first infusion, she viewed an informational video provided by Centocor that explained the benefits of Remicade but did not mention lupus-like syndrome as a potential side effect. The 2001 Remicade package insert, however, did warn physicians about this potential side effect, noting it was “rare.” Initially, Patricia’s Crohn’s disease responded well to Remicade, but she began experiencing severe joint pain. She was referred to Dr. Pop-Moody, a rheumatologist, who prescribed additional Remicade treatments. Despite testing positive for systemic lupus erythematosus in 2002, Patricia continued Remicade treatments until 2003, when specialists at the University of Texas Health Science Center diagnosed her with lupus-like syndrome potentially induced by Remicade. After discontinuing Remicade, her lupus-like symptoms subsided.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
Topic Outline
Topic Refresher Course
Topic Charts & Notes 
11m 7s