SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Administrative Law Keyed to Mawshaw
Carpenter v. United States
Citation:
138 S. Ct. 2206 (2018)Facts
In 2011, police arrested four men suspected of robbing a series of RadioShack and T-Mobile stores in Michigan and Ohio. One suspect identified Timothy Carpenter as an accomplice and provided his cell phone number. Based on this information, prosecutors obtained court orders under the Stored Communications Act to access Carpenter’s cell-site location records from his wireless carriers, MetroPCS and Sprint. The government acquired 12,898 location data points cataloging Carpenter’s movements over 127 days—an average of 101 data points per day. These records placed Carpenter’s phone near four of the robbery locations at the time of the crimes. Carpenter moved to suppress this evidence, arguing that the government’s warrantless acquisition of these records violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The motion was denied, and Carpenter was convicted of robbery and firearms offenses based partly on the cell-site evidence. The Sixth Circuit affirmed, holding that Carpenter had no reasonable expectation of privacy in information he voluntarily shared with his wireless carriers.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.