Law Study Aids
Courses
- 1L Prep Course
Solutions
- Professors and Institutions

Generic selectors

Exact matches only

Search in title

Search in content

Post Type Selectors

Advanced Search | Notes Search

Start My FREE 7-DAY Trial

Log In

Remember Me

Forgot Password?

Forgot Password?

Forgotten Password

Cancel

Generic selectors

Exact matches only

Search in title

Search in content

Post Type Selectors

Law Study Aids
Courses
- 1L Prep Course
Solutions
- Professors and Institutions

Start My FREE 7-DAY Trial

Log In Sign up

Remember Me

Forgot Password?

Forgot Password?

Forgotten Password

Cancel

SmartBrief enables case brief popups that define Key Terms, Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises used in this case.

SmartBrief

A.I Enhanced Margin Brief to quickly recall case brief

A.I Enhanced Margin Brief to quickly recall case brief

Sections to print

Brief Prologue
Case Brief
Brief Epilogue
Notes

To print, please Start a Free Trial or Log in.

Confirm favorite deletion?

Cancel Yes, Delete

Civil Procedure Keyed to Mueller

View this case in different Casebooks

Civil Procedure Keyed to Cound Civil Procedure Keyed to Friedenthal Civil Procedure Keyed to Marcus Civil Procedure Keyed to Subrin Civil Procedure Keyed to Yeazell Civil Procedure Keyed to Yeazell Conflicts Keyed to Currie Civil Procedure Keyed to Hazard Civil Procedure Keyed to Spencer Civil Procedure Keyed to Field

Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative

Citation:

356 U.S. 525 (1958)

Start Your Free Trial or Log in.

Facts

Byrd (Petitioner), a citizen of North Carolina, sued Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative (Respondent), a South Carolina corporation, under diversity jurisdiction in federal court for negligence that caused his injury while employed as an independent contractor. Respondent argued that Petitioner was considered an employee under the South Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act and thus could not sue Respondent.

Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*

Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.

*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue

The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.

Start Your Free Trial or Log in.

The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.

Start Your Free Trial or Log in.

The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.

Start Your Free Trial or Log in.

Case Quiz

Retake Attempts

Question 1 of 3

Results

0 of 3 Questions answered correctly.

Results

Quiz complete. Results are being recorded.

Q.1 - How does the interplay between Byrd and Hanna v. Plumer illustrate the limits of federal procedural autonomy under the Erie framework?

Start Your Free Trial or Log in.

(A) Byrd holds that any Federal Rule of Civil Procedure addressing an issue automatically displaces conflicting state law, whereas Hanna carves exceptions when outcome determinative.

Incorrect. A is incorrect because Byrd did not treat every Rule as displacing state law, only federal interests.

(B) Byrd introduced a balancing of state and federal interests for non-Rule issues, and Hanna confirmed that when a Rule is “sufficiently broad,” it controls despite state concerns.

Correct! Byrd holds that in areas not covered by a Federal Rule, federal courts balance state outcome concerns against federal interests (here, jury trial), while Hanna later clarified that where a Rule “sufficiently covers” the issue, it governs—even if outcome-determinative. This pairing defines the outer limits of procedural autonomy under Erie.

(C) Byrd applied an absolute outcome-determinative test for Erie questions, while Hanna abandoned outcome determinacy entirely in favor of uniform Rule application.

Incorrect. C is incorrect because Byrd expressly rejected an absolute outcome-determinative test.

(D) Byrd emphasized the Full Faith and Credit Clause in procedural choice-of-law, and Hanna subsequently overruled that emphasis by prioritizing congressional rule-making.

Incorrect. D is incorrect because neither case rests on Full Faith and Credit doctrine.

Q.2 - Which of the following most sharply captures a genuine theoretical objection—rooted in structural constitutionalism—to the Byrd Court’s balancing approach?

Start Your Free Trial or Log in.

(A) That it inappropriately imports a structural separation-of-powers rationale into what should be a pure choice-of-law inquiry under Erie.

Incorrect. A is incorrect because invoking separation-of-powers for jury structure is constitutionally appropriate when the Seventh Amendment applies.

(B) That it undermines stare decisis by treating Guaranty Trust as mere dicta rather than binding precedent.

Incorrect. B is incorrect because Byrd engages Guaranty Trust directly, not as mere dicta.

(C) That it conflates the Seventh Amendment with the Due Process Clause, creating an anomalous procedural right.

Incorrect. C is incorrect because Byrd differentiates the Seventh Amendment’s jury right from due process.

(D) That it permits federal courts to manufacture “federal common law” whenever state procedure conflicts with perceived federal institutional interests.

Correct! A structural constitutional objection observes that Byrd arguably empowers courts to create ad hoc “federal common law” whenever state procedures conflict with perceived federal institutional needs, an approach at odds with Erie’s rejection of judge-made federal law in diversity.

Q.3 - Assume a federal diversity court is faced with South Carolina’s rule requiring judges to decide admissibility of expert testimony (a traditionally factual issue). Applying Byrd’s balancing test, which outcome best aligns with its reasoning?

Start Your Free Trial or Log in.

(A) The court submits admissibility to the judge, since Federal Rule of Evidence 702 reflects a uniform federal policy predating state practice.

Correct! Under Byrd, where a Federal Rule (here, Rule 702) speaks directly to expert admissibility, the uniform federal policy supersedes conflicting state procedure, even if that alters fact-finder allocation. That preserves federal procedural consistency.

(B) The court follows South Carolina’s judge-only rule because expert admissibility is substantive under state law.

Incorrect. B is incorrect because Byrd allows federal Rules to override state practice when they address the issue.

(C) The court bifurcates the issue, the judge rules on qualifications, jury on reliability, blending state and federal interests.

Incorrect. C is incorrect because Byrd does not endorse piecemeal hybrid fact-finding allocations.

(D) The court submits the entire admissibility determination to the jury, invoking the Seventh Amendment’s preservation of jury factfinding.

Incorrect. D is incorrect because Byrd protects jury rights only where no controlling Rule exists.

MarginBrief^™ Case overview for optimal recall

A.I Enhanced Margin Brief to quickly recall case brief

Generating...

Facts:

Quickly review the Facts of this case including its key ideas for optimal understanding and recall.

Quickly review the Facts of this case including its key ideas for optimal understanding and recall.

Issue:

Utilize our powerful A.I. tools to easily capture and understand the Issue in this case.

Utilize our powerful A.I. tools to easily capture and understand the Issue in this case.

Rule:

Easily understand the Rule in this case so you have a complete and thorough appreciation for overall case concepts completely tying together what occurred, the court’s questions and the case outcome.

Easily understand the Rule in this case so you have a complete and thorough appreciation for overall case concepts completely tying together what occurred, the court’s questions and the case outcome.

Start Your Free Trial or Log in.

Topic Resources

^™ CaseCast

Todd Berman

ProfessorTodd Berman

CaseCast™ "What you need to know"

CaseCast™ – "What you need to know"

Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.

To continue listening to this CaseCast™ please Subscribe

Topic Videos

Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative

3m 37s

See complete Lesson, Quizzes and More

Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative

1m 41s

See complete Lesson, Quizzes and More

Topic Outline

Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Status:

Your Law School
Success Begins Here

Case Briefs - the Socratic Savior! – Best in class and Largest Library of complete I.R.A.C. / C.R.E.A.C. Law School case briefs. Includes:
- SmartBriefs® - Enhanced case briefs for optimal clarity
- New Case Videos - Explained and Summarized for optimal case understanding
- CaseCast® - Professor overviews of "What you need to know"
- New MarginBrief® - A.I. - Powered for faster, more efficient case recall
Lessons - Professor delivered video for topic reinforcement
Outlines - Professor written - downloadable, amendable and includes test-taking tips and tools
New Case Quiz - Reinforce case principles, instantly scored
Refresher Courses - Quick course reviews with interactive exercises
Quizzes and Exams - over 5,000 Multiple Choice and Essay questions all Professor curated and answered
New My Reviewer™ - Instantly receive a Score, Critique and Feedback on your legal writing
Exam Prep Workshops - Delivered by Professors on how to disect, organize and answer law school exam questions
and so much more ...

Start your FREE Trial

Notepad Click anywhere in notepad to add a note

Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative