SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Business Organizations Keyed to Cox
Broz v. Cellular Information Systems, Inc.
Citation:
673 A.2d 148 (1996)Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Robert F. Broz was the President and sole stockholder of RFB Cellular, Inc. In April 1994, Markinac Cellular Corp. wanted to sell its FCC cellular-phone-license area, known as Michigan-2. Mackinac’s broker, Daniels, contacted Broz and broached the subject of Rural Service Area Cellular License’s possible acquisition of Michigan-2. When Broz had become aware of the opportunity to purchase the Michigan-2 license, a third party, PriCellular, Inc. had been in negotiations to purchase CIS’s stock through negotiated transactions and a tender offer. The tender offer closed nine days after Broz purchased the license, and PriCellular became the owner of CIS. PriCellular then caused CIS to sue Broz on the ground that the purchase of the Michigan-2 license usurped a CIS corporate opportunity.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
11m 27s
