SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Antitrust Keyed to Areeda, 8th Ed.
Barry Wright Corp. v. ITT Grinnell Corp.
Citation:
724 F.2d 227 (1983)Facts
Pacific Scientific was the only domestic manufacturer of mechanical snubbers, controlling 47% of all snubbers sold in 1976, increasing to 94% by 1979. Grinnell, a major customer accounting for approximately 50% of all mechanical snubber purchases, sought to develop an alternative supplier by contracting with Barry Wright in 1976. Under this agreement, Grinnell would help fund Barry’s development costs in exchange for Barry becoming Grinnell’s exclusive supplier between 1977-1979. When Pacific learned of this arrangement, it offered Grinnell special discounts (30% for small snubbers, 25% for larger ones) on large orders. Barry failed to meet its production deadlines, and in January 1977, Grinnell placed a $4.3 million order with Pacific at the special discount rates. Pacific included an option for Grinnell to buy its 1978 requirements at the same prices and inserted a non-cancellation clause making it costly for Grinnell to break the agreement. By May 1977, Grinnell and Pacific agreed to additional purchases for 1978 ($6.9 million) and 1979 ($5 million). In June 1977, Grinnell terminated its relationship with Barry, which subsequently abandoned its snubber development efforts and filed this lawsuit.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.