SmartBrief
0
Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Blum
Baer v. Chase
Citation:
392 F.3d 609 (2004)Facts
Baer and Chase met for lunch and Baer, who wanted to start his career in television production, suggested a film about the New Jersey Mafia. In 1995, they visited New Jersey and Baer arranged meetings with detectives who shared their experiences with organized crime. After returning to California, Chase sent Baer a copy of a draft of his The Sopranos screenplay. They discussed this screenplay numerous times. Baer claims that he and Chase agreed, orally, multiple times, that if the show became a hit, Chase would “take care of” Baer and “remunerate [him] in a manner commensurate to the true value of his services.” None of this was written down. Baer then did not hear from Chase until he heard from one of the New Jersey detectives that Chase was filming The Sopranos. Chase did not pay Baer. Baer then brought this claim, alleging various actions, including breach of contract. Chase moved for summary judgement, asserting the contract was too “vague, ambiguous, and lacking in essential terms to be enforced.”
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
2m 29s