SmartBrief
0
Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Summers
Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp.
Citation:
258 Minn. 533, 104 N.W.2d 661Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Baehr (plaintiff) leased several gas stations to Kemp pursuant to written leases. Kemp later became indebted to Penn-O-Tex Oil Corporation (“Penn-O-Tex”) (defendant) and assigned his accounts receivable (including the gas stations) to Penn-O-Tex. Kemp informed Baehr that Penn-O-Tex had his assets tied up. Baehr wrote to Penn-O-Tex to inquire about what he had to do to get his rent checks. Penn-O-Tex replied stating that it was assisting Kemp in keeping the business going, but was not responsible for the operation of the gas stations. Baehr reached out again to Penn-O-Tex, who replied that they would see to it that Baehr received his rents. Baehr never received any rents from Penn-O-Tex. Baehr sued Penn-O-Tex to recover the rents.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
12m 9s
