SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Torts Keyed to Duncan
Anderson v. Owen-sCorning Fiberglas Corp.
Citation:
810 P.2d 549 (Ca. 1991)Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Carl Anderson (plaintiff), an electrician working at the Long Beach Naval Shipyard, sued various manufacturers of products containing asbestos (defendants) for exposing him to asbestos. In his amended complaint, he alleged strict liability for failure to properly warn of the dangers inherent in exposure to the products, seeking punitive damages. The defendants raised a state of the art defense, claiming they could not have known the dangers of asbestos in the concentration associated with their products. Before trial, the plaintiff moved to exclude any state of the art evidence. The defendants argued if the defense was precluded, then the plaintiff should not be allowed to pursue their failure to warn theory.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
11m 7s
