SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Remedies Keyed to Tabb, 8th
Altom v. Hawes
Citation:
380 N.E.2d 7 (1978)Facts
On February 10, 1976, Janice Altom and her husband Melvin Altom entered into a separation agreement granting Janice exclusive possession of the marital home and household furniture. On March 7, 1976, Melvin called his friend Tracy Hawes and sold him furniture for $1,500, providing a bill of sale. Tracy was aware of marital difficulties but not the separation agreement. Janice filed for divorce on March 18, 1976, and a decree was entered on May 6, 1976, which included a judgment against Melvin for $1,500 for violating the separation agreement by selling Janice’s furniture. Approximately one month after the divorce decree, Janice filed a replevin action against the Haweses to recover the furniture itself.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.