SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Constitutional Law Keyed to Maggs
Allied Structural Steel Company v. Spannaus
Citation:
438 U.S. 234 (1978)Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Appellant, an Illinois corporation with an office in Minnesota, maintained a pension plan that entitled employees who were at least 65 years old at retirement to receive benefits as long as the company was still in business and the plan was still in effect. In 1974, Minnesota enacted the Private Pension Benefits Protection Act, which required certain employers in Minnesota to pay a pension funding charge if they terminated a pension plan or closed a Minnesota office and at the time of termination or closure, existing pension funds were not sufficient to pay pensions to employees who had worked at least 10 years. When appellant closed its Minnesota office, at least nine of the newly discharged employees did not have vested pension rights under the company’s plan but qualified for pension benefits under the Act because they had been employed by the company for more than 10 years. The State assessed appellant a pension funding charge of approximately $185,000 and appellant challenged the constitutionality of the Act under the Contract Clause.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.