Confirm favorite deletion?
Constitutional Law Keyed to Varat
44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island
Citation:517 U.S. 484, 116 S.Ct. 1495, 134 L.Ed.2d 711 (1996).
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Rhode Island law prohibited state vendors and out-of-state manufacturers from advertising the prices of alcoholic beverages. A second law prohibited the state’s news media from publishing or broadcasting any advertisements making reference to the price of alcoholic beverages.
Plaintiffs placed an advertisement in a Rhode Island newspaper that did not state the prices of any alcoholic beverage, but did state low prices for items like peanuts, potato chips and Schweppes mixers. It included the word “WOW” in large letters next to the picture of vodka and rum bottles. Based on the implied reference, the Rhode Island Control Administrator assessed a fine. Plaintiffs after paying the fine sought a declaratory judgement, arguing both laws violated the First Amendment.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.