This question should be answered in IRAC format. Please include all relevant keywords, terms, and phrases when discussing each topic.
In litigation over whether Rally conveyed “Quik Snacks”, a Convenient Store, to his daughter Tania, Tania wishes to offer into evidence a tape recording of Rally made by Hani, his brother. The voice on the tape is discussing “Quik Snacks” and other property owned by Rally. Tania wishes to have Hani testify that the voice on the tape is Rally’s.
Should the Court allow Hani to testify? Why or why not?
Consider the relationship between Hani and Rally. Do the rules of evidence allow for voice identification once a relationship between the two parties has been established?