This question should be answered in an IRAC format. Please include all relevant keywords, terms, and phrases when discussing each topic.
Toni, owner of Tulip Land, granted to Mandy, owner of Emerald Land, an easement of way. Toni then went to Italy to live. Mandy then moved into possession of Tulip Land and used it openly and exclusively, paying taxes, for 23 years. She did not use her easement during this period of time. Toni, unable to hold a job because of his lack of ability to learn Italian, returned, and tried to evict Mandy from Tulip Land. Assume that the court held that Mandy had acquired Tulip Land by adverse possession. Mandy then sold Tulip Land back to Toni who, pissed off, put a chain across the easement.
Mandy has now brought an action to remove the chain.
What result?
NotepadClick anywhere in notepad to add a note
Remember that merger is one way in which an easement can be terminated. How does that apply here?
Topics
Grammar
Readability
Tone