Wills Trusts & Estates keyed to Dukeminier
Farkas v. Williams
Farkas purchased stock of Investors Mutual, Inc. At the time of each purchase, he executed a written application directing the company to issue stock in his name “as trustee for Richard J. Williams.” Along with the applications, Farkas signed separate declarations of trust. Farkas retained the power to vote, sell, redeem, and exchange the stock. He also retained the right to change the beneficiary or revoke the trust at any time. Upon his death, the title to the stock was to be vested in the beneficiary. When Farkas died, Williams sought to have the stock directed to him. However the circuit court held that the trust declarations were testamentary in character and were invalid.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.