Wills Trusts & Estates keyed to Dukeminier
Janus v. Tarasewicz
On September 29, 1982, husband and wife, Stanley and Theresa Janus, decedents, unknowingly ingested cyanide-laced Tylenol capsules. Shortly afterwards Stanley collapsed on the floor. Theresa was still standing when a nurse came to the scene and began performing CPR on Stanley. Minutes later, at approximately 5:45pm, paramedic Ronald Mahon arrived and saw Theresa faint and go into seizures. She was breathing on her own but her pupils didn’t respond to light. In a paramedic’s report Mahon wrote that at approximately 6:00pm Stanley had “zero blood pressure, zero pulse and zero respiration.” Paramedic Robert Lockhart arrived at 5:55pm and both Stanley and Theresa were unconscious with non-reactive pupils. Lockhart intubated both of them and in order to keep their air passages open. Neither Stanley nor Theresa showed signs of being able to breathe on their own while being transported to the hospital. However, Lockhart stated that when Theresa had a palpable pulse and blood pressure when she was turned over to hospital personnel. At approximately 6:30pm the medical director of the intensive care unit at the hospital examined them and Stanley had no blood pressure or pulse. Due to the fact Stanley never developed spontaneous blood pressure, pulse or signs of respiration, he was pronounced dead at 8:15pm on September 29, 1982. Upon admittance to the hospital, Theresa showed no visible vital signs but hospital personnel were able to get her heart beating on its own again and were able to establish a measurable, but unsatisfactory, blood pressure. In the medical director’s opinion, Theresa was in a deep coma with very unstable vital signs when she was moved to the intensive care unit at 9:30pm on September 29, 1982. On September 30, 1982, various tests were performed on Theresa to assess her brain function and as a result of these tests, she was diagnosed as having sustained total brain death, her life support systems were then terminated, and she was pronounced dead at 1:15pm on October 1, 1982. More than three weeks later death certificates were issued by the a medical examiner’s physician who never examined them but listed Stanley’s date of death as September 29, 1982 and Theresa’s date of death as October 1, 1982. Theresa was the primary beneficiary under Stanley’s life insurance policy and after concluding that Theresa survived Stanley, the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company paid the proceeds of Stanley’s $100,000 life insurance policy to the administrator of Theresa’s estate. Stanley’s mother Alojza Janus, plaintiff, brought a declaratory judgment action against the insurance company and the administrators of Stanley and Theresa’s estates, claiming the proceeds of the insurance policy as the contingent beneficiary of the policy. The trial court heard testimony from several expert witness and concluded that Theresa survived Stanley but the court did say by how long she survived him. Plaintiff appeals, contending there’s insufficient evidence to prove that both victims did not suffer brain death prior to their arrival at the hospital on September 29, 1982.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.