Torts Keyed to Henderson
Union Pump Co. v. Allbritton
Facts
In 1989, a pump manufactured by Union Pump Company (Defendant) caught fire at Texaco Chemical Company’s (Texaco) facility in Port Arthur, Texas. Sue Allbritton (Plaintiff), a trainee employee of Texaco who had just finished her shift was about to leave the facility when the fire erupted. She and her supervisor, Felipe Subia, Jr., were directed to assist in putting out the fire. After the fire had been extinguished, it was learned that there was an emergency situation with a nitrogen purge valve. Subia was instructed to block the valve. Plaintiff asked to go with Subia to assist and he agreed. To get to the valve, Plaintiff followed Subia on an unsafe route over an aboveground pipe rack, which was about 2 1/2 feet high, instead of going around it. After securing the valve, Subia returned by walking over the pipe rack and Plaintiff followed. Plaintiff slipped off the rack, which was wet due to the water associated with the fire that had just been extinguished, and sustained injuries. Plaintiff sued Defendant asserting claims for negligence, gross negligence, and strict liability. Plaintiff claimed that the defective pump was the proximate cause or producing cause of her injuries. The trial court granted Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and Plaintiff appealed. The court of appeals reversed, finding that Plaintiff raised issues of fact concerning proximate cause or producing cause. Defendant appealed to the Texas Supreme Court.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.