Confirm favorite deletion?
Torts Keyed to Henderson
Troja v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.
Facts
Robert Krohn hired Michael Troja (Plaintiff) to build a bar. Plaintiff borrowed Krohn’s radial arm saw manufactured by Black & Decker Manufacturing Company (Defendant). Plaintiff and Krohn removed the saw from its metal base and stand in order that it could be carried from the basement to the work site. The saw’s guide fence and metal base were left behind. Without its base, Plaintiff placed the saw directly on the floor and rigged a makeshift guide fence by securing an aluminum level to the saw with clamps. Plaintiff was attempting to make a cross-cut, guiding the wood with his hand, when the saw slipped and amputated Plaintiff’s finger. The instruction manual accompanying the saw properly explained how to execute a cross-cut. Plaintiff sued Defendant for strict products liability. At trial, Plaintiff presented an expert who would have testified that an alternative to Defendant’s saw could have been manufactured so that the unit would not work if the guide fence was not in place. The trial court refused to allow the expert’s testimony and ruled that Plaintiff had failed to produce any legally sufficient evidence of an alternative radial arm saw design or the existence of the technology necessary to produce such a product in 1976, the year that the saw was made. The trial judge granted Defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on the defective design portion of Plaintiff’s strict liability count and Plaintiff appealed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.