Torts Keyed to Goldberg
Klein v. Pyrodyne Corp.
Facts
Pyrodyne Corporation was contracted to conduct a public fireworks display at the Western Washington State Fairgrounds in Puyallup, Washington, on July 4, 1987. As part of the contract, Pyrodyne was required to procure a $1 million liability insurance policy. During the fireworks show, one of the aerial shells misfired due to a mortar being knocked into a horizontal position. The shell exploded near the crowd, injuring Danny and Marion Klein along with others. The Kleins filed a lawsuit against Pyrodyne, claiming strict liability and product liability. They alleged that Pyrodyne’s employees had failed to properly bury the mortar tubes, provide necessary safety measures such as crowd control, and adhere to other regulatory requirements. Pyrodyne argued that the misfire was due to a manufacturing defect. The trial court ruled against the Kleins on the product liability claim but held Pyrodyne strictly liable under the doctrine of abnormally dangerous activities. Pyrodyne appealed the decision. The Washington Supreme Court upheld the trial court’s decision, concluding that the fireworks display constituted an abnormally dangerous activity, justifying the imposition of strict liability on Pyrodyne regardless of the level of care exercised. The court emphasized that activities involving explosives near large crowds inherently pose a high risk of harm, which cannot be completely eliminated even with strict adherence to safety protocols.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.