Property Law Keyed to Cribbet
Town of Telluride v. Lot Thirty-Four Venture, L.L.C
The Town of Telluride enacted an ordinance (1011) which imposed an affordable housing requirement on new development. The ordinance requires developers to mitigate the effects of new development by providing affordable housing units for forty percent of the new employees generated by such development. The requirement is to create 350 square feet of housing space for forty percent of the proposed employees to a development. This requirement could be satisfied by 1. Constructing new units and deed- restricting them as affordable housing. 2. Deed-restricting “existing free market units” as affordable housing. 3. Pay fees in lieu of deed restricted housing. Or 4. Convey land to the Town of Telluride with a fair market value equivalent to the fee paid under the third option. Thereafter, the town enacted certain guidelines for affordable housing which stated that if the developer chooses either deed restriction option the guidelines will set maximum rental rates per square foot. The unit’s maximum rent is computed by multiplying a constant money amount, such as $1.42 for a single bedroom apartment, with the total square footage. The guidelines place a cap on increases for housing at 2.5% per year, unless the town’s Housing Authority allows a higher increase. The sale of deed restricted property is limited to qualified residents or to a qualified owner who will rent to qualified residents. The maximum sale price per square foot is capped, as is the annual growth of that price per square foot. The guidelines also set a price for the payment in lieu of construction option where the payments would be used by the town to create affordable housing. Lot Thirty-Four Venture, L.L.C., (Thirty Four Venture) is a developer who challenged the restrictions imposed by the ordinance and guidelines on the basis that they constituted rent control in violation of a Colorado statute prohibiting rent control when municipalities attempt to control rents on private property. Both town and Thirty Four Venture moved for summary judgment in the trial court, and the town’s motion was granted. The intermediate appellate court reversed. The Town of Telluride appealed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.