SmartBrief
0
Confirm favorite deletion?
Property Keyed to Sprankling
Sundowner, Inc. v. King
Citation:
509 P.2d 785 (1973)Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
In 1966, Robert Bushnell (Plaintiff-Appellee) sold a motel to the Kings (Defendant-Appellants). The Plaintiff-Appellee then built another motel, the Desert Inn, on an adjoining property. The Defendant-Appellants filed suit against Plaintiff-Appellee, alleging misrepresentation in the 1966 sale of the motel. In 1968, the Defendant-Appellants erected a structure 85 feet in length and 18 feet in height 16 inches from the Plaintiff-Appellee’s property line. The Defendant-Appellants claim this structure was built as an advertisement for their motel and to differentiate between the two motels, not as a spite fence. The trial court was presented with substantial evidence that the structure obstructed light and air from reaching the Desert Inn, had little to no advertising value due to its location and type, and that the structure was the largest structure then in existence in the area.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
7m 22s
