Confirm favorite deletion?
Property Keyed to Saxer
Deep Water Brewing, LLC v. Fairway Resources Limited
Facts
The Kenagys (Plaintiffs) purchased a restaurant overlooking a lake from Cindy Smith and her brother Robert Ahlquist. Paintiffs then leased the restaurant to their company, Deep Water Brewing, LLC (plaintiff). Jack Johnson, president of Key Development Corporation and David Milne, president of Fairway Resources, Limited (Defendants) wanted to develop the land between the restaurant and the lake into single-family homes. Prior to the transfer of the restaurant to Paintiffs, Ahlquist executed an easement and right-of-way agreement that (1) allowed Defendants access across the restaurant property to begin the development and (2) placed a restrictive covenant prohibiting any constructed house to obscure the view of the lake from the restaurant’s first-floor lounge. Additionally, the agreement required the establishment of a Homeowners Association (HOA) (Defendant) to protect the rights of Ahlquist. Johnson named himself President of the HOA, but failed to disclose the agreements to subsequent home builders. Further, Johnson permitted “maximum height levels” of homes to be built so as to obscure the view of the lake from the first-floor lounge. Paintiffs sued Defendants for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief to enforce the provisions of the easement and agreement that protected their view of the lake. Paintiffs later added Michael and Patricia Taylor as defendants. The Taylors had begun construction of a two-story home, approved by Johnson and the HOA, which significantly obscured the view of the lake from the restaurant. The trial court held that Defendants breached the initial agreement with Ahlquist and that the HOA and Johnson had tortiously interfered with the agreement and imposed a judgment of $245,000 in favor of Plaintiffs. The trial court further held that the Taylors were bona fide purchasers without notice and were therefore not liable to Paintiffs. Defendants, other than the Taylors, appealed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.