Confirm favorite deletion?
Property Keyed to Saxer
Brant v. Hargrove
Facts
Nick Mercer and his wife, Anastasia Mercer (Defendants), owned property together as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. Nick Mercer validly executed a deed of trust and a promissory note on the property in return for a loan issued by Edmund and Dolores Brant (Plaintiffs). Plaintiffs sued to recover the amount due and to foreclose on the deed of trust. Prior to the foreclosure action, Anastasia passed away. Plaintiffs argued that, by operation of the joint tenancy, Nick acquired Anastasia’s interest, subjecting the entire property to the deed of trust lien. The trial court held that the deed of trust was a valid lien on the entire property.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.