Property Keyed to Rabin
Urquhart v. Teller
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
In 1971, Teller (Defendant) sold 270 of his 280 acres to Urquhart (Plaintiff). The parties agreed that when Defendant died or if and when he wanted to sell his remaining ten acres, Plaintiff would have the option to buy that land for $12,000. In 1982, Plaintiff transferred the 270 acres to the Plaintiff Living Trust, which sold the property to Spring Creek Investments. Plaintiff assigned the option but also agreed to exercise the option on Spring Creek’s behalf if the option was unassignable. In 1993, Defendant donated his ten acres to Cinnabar, a non-profit organization. The ten acres had become worth nearly $400,000. Plaintiff then sued to enforce the option. The district court held that the option, a preemptive right of first refusal, was an unreasonable restraint on alienation and that it would be inequitable to enforce the terms of the right of first refusal. Plaintiff appealed.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.