Property Keyed to Rabin
Northwest Realty Co. v. Jacobs
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
The Iowa Irrigation Ditch Company (IIDC) obtained quitclaim deeds along the course of a proposed irrigation ditch. Some of the deeds granted unconditional fee title while others granted easements with “reverter to grantor” clauses. In 1898, Jacob Smith delivered to IIDC a deed that would “grant, remise, release and quitclaim . . . all his estate, right, title, interest, and claim” to a strip of land adjoining the proposed ditch. It further recited that as further consideration “of this right of way” that IIDC would provide water at the regular established price as soon as the irrigation ditch was in operation. To identify the strip, the deed referred to a recorded plat, which indicated a single line. IIDC stock was issued to the owners of each tract of land irrigated from the ditch. Ted and Olive Jacobs (Defendants) are successors to one of these landowners. In 1973, IIDC shareholders voted to dissolve the corporation and deliver quitclaim deeds to the owners of the land adjacent to the ditch, lands which were subject to easements for the ditch. The ditch itself was destroyed in a flood. IIDC then conveyed a portion of “the real property owned by the corporation” to Kenneth Shabina, who conveyed it to Northwest Realty Company (Plaintiff). Defendants later filled a portion of the ditch to use as a parking lot. Plaintiff, claiming it had fee title to the ditch, sued for an injunction to compel Defendants to remove the fill from the ditch. Defendants appealed the trial court’s decision.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.