Confirm favorite deletion?
Property Keyed to Merrill
Edwards v. Allouez Mining Co.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Allouez Mining Company constructed a copper-mining mill upon a creek. Part of the copper-mining process required large amounts of sand flowed be in the creek. Then, the sand flowed were deposited upon a nearby downstream tracts of land. Edwards purchased one of the downstream tracts of land about one year after Allouez built the mill. Edwards’s intent of purchasing the land was to compel Allouez to purchase the land at a large profit, not for personal use. Edwards offered to sell Allouez the land for about three to five times the amount that Edwards paid. Thereafter, Allouez refused to accept the offer. Edwards instigated this action to enjoin Allouez from depositing sand on his land. Subsequently, the trial court denied Edward’s injunction, but directed the case to a jury trial for damages determination. Edwards appealed.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.