Property Keyed to French
Wendt v. Host Int’l, Inc.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
George Wendt and John Ratzenberger (Plaintiffs), actors in the TV showCheers, sued Host International and Paramount Picture Corporation (Defendants). Host created robotic figures that Plaintiffs claimed were based on their likenesses, and placed them in airport bars that were modeled on theCheersset. Plaintiffs sued based on California’s statutory and common law rights of publicity, and for unfair competition in violation of the federal Lanham Act. The district court dismissed the claims after it compared photographs of Plaintiffs with photographs of the robots and determined that the robots did not resemble Plaintiffs. The Ninth Circuit reversed, holding that the trier of fact must compare the actual robots with the actual actors. The district court then granted summary judgment for Defendants a second time after the judge visually inspected the robots. Plaintiffs appealed again.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.