Confirm favorite deletion?
Property Keyed to French
Smolen v. Smolen
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
In 1970, Martin Smolen and Roslyn Smolen (Plaintiff) married. Decades later, Martin developed a brain tumor, and the couple divorced in 1994 in order to protect their assets from the costs of his future medical care. In its divorce decree, the district court ordered that their mutual residence in Las Vegas would remain in joint tenancy. Martin and Roslyn intended that the survivor would own the residence. Later in 1994, Martin’s condition deteriorated. Roslyn obtained legal guardianship of him without his consent, and put him in a group home against his wishes. Martin then contacted his nephew Jason Smolen (Defendant), who hired an attorney to assist Martin. The attorney moved for Roslyn’s guardianship to be revoked, and the district court granted the motion in 1995. Martin then established a trust with Jason as the sole beneficiary and successor trustee, and deeded his interest in the Las Vegas residence to the trust. Martin later suffered a stroke and died in October 1995. Two months later, Roslyn moved to cancel the deed transferring Martin’s interest to the trust. Roslyn argued that she and Martin had intended for the survivor to be the sole owner of the residence. Roslyn argued that the divorce decree recognized that the residence was held in joint tenancy, and implicitly prohibited the destruction of the joint tenancy. The district court agreed that the deed violated the divorce decree and was void. Jason then appealed.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.