Property Keyed to French
Rosner v. United States
In 1944, Germany invaded Hungary, and the Hungarian government ordered Jews to turn in their gold, jewelry, and other valuable personal property. The property was later loaded onto a Germany-bound train, which was known as the Gold Train. The Gold Train was seized in Austria by the United States Army in 1945. Many years later, a group of Hungarian Jewish Holocaust survivors (Plaintiffs) brought this class action lawsuit against Defendant on behalf of Hungarian Jews and their descendants. Plaintiffs claim that the property on the Gold Train was identifiable because it was kept in labeled boxes. Plaintiffs claim that Defendant nonetheless determined in 1946 that it was impossible to determine the rightful owners of the property, and that the Gold Train’s contents were sold or requisitioned by the Army. Plaintiffs also claim that much of the property was looted from military storage. Plaintiffs only learned of these facts in 1999, when the United States government released a report on the matter. Plaintiffs claimed that these actions were an unconstitutional taking in violation of the Fifth Amendment, a breach of an implied contract of bailment, and violations of international law. The government moved to dismiss on grounds of untimeliness, failure to state a claim, and sovereign immunity.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.