Marijuana Law – Keyed to Mikos
United States v. Real Property and Improvements Located at 1840 Embarcadero, Oakland, California
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
The Plaintiff’s, the United State’s of America, institutes an in rem forfeiture action against Defendant’s property, a multi-tenant commercial building. The Defendant’s property conducts its business with the title Harborside Health Center, a retail marijuana store. Ana Chreitien is the sole owner of the Defendant’s real property. Harborside has a leasehold interest in the property. Harborside, in 2006, obtained a permit to distribute marijuana at the property.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.