Health Law Keyed to Furrow
Esquivel v. Watters
Michelle Esquivel (Plaintiff) went to South Central Kansas Regional Medical Center (Defendant) for a free sonogram. She signed a consent form stating the procedure's purpose was only to discover the sex of the unborn baby, and it was not to determine fetal abnormalities. There was also a release clause contained in the form for any cause of action that could originate as a result of the procedure. The technician discovered that the Plaintiff's baby's bowel was outside the body, a condition known as gastroschisis. He did not tell Plaintiff of the discovery, because he is not a doctor and was not qualified to make a diagnosis. He took the sonogram pictures and sent them to a radiologist, but the radiologist would not look at them since the purpose of the sonogram was to discover the sex of the baby, not for diagnosis. The technician also reported the irregularity to Plaintiff's obstetrician, but did not send him the sonogram pictures or a written report. The obstetrician told his assistant to call the Plaintiff. The assistant tried for ten days, and then left a message with a man she believed to be Plaintiff's husband. The Plaintiff missed her next prenatal appointment, and by the time of her next appointment, five weeks later, the obstetrician had forgotten the issue. Plaintiff's baby was born by emergency caesarean section after Plaintiff became ill. The baby's condition was terminal. After he died, the Esquivels (Plaintiff) sued Defendant. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant because the clinic did not owe the Plaintiffs a duty upon which they based their claims. The claims were barred by the release signed by Plaintiff before the sonogram. Plaintiffs appealed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.