Confirm favorite deletion?
Criminal Law Keyed to Weaver
Hopson v. Texas
Facts
Karissa Lou Hopson (Defendant) was arrested after police found her standing on the front porch of a house, holding a television. When the police arrived, they saw that the house’s windows were broken and that Defendant had blood on her shirt and hand. There was also damage to the inside of the house. Defendant was subsequently charged with burglary. Defendant testified that she picked up the television because she believed she was stopping a burglary in progress, not because she intended to commit a burglary. Defendant said that she had gone by the house and found a man taking things out of the house. In fact, the owners had given the man permission to go inside and pick up some of his belongings. Defendant testified that the man left after she confronted him, and that she then found the television sitting outside. Believing that the man had taken the television out of the house as part of a burglary, Defendant picked up the television to put it back in the house. Defendant maintained that her intention was not to commit a burglary, but to prevent one.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.