Criminal Law Keyed to Johnson
United States v. Andrews
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Thirty-eight members and associates of the El Rukn street gang (Defendants) were charged in a 175-count indictment that detailed over 250 separate criminal acts committed between 1966 and 1989 in various locations. Count one of the indictment charged Defendants with conspiracy to violate the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act and alleged that El Rukn was a racketeering enterprise as defined in RICO. Defendants were accused of conducting El Rukn’s affairs through the commission of at least twenty murders, twelve attempted murders, eleven conspiracies to murder, kidnapping, and wide-scale drug trafficking. Count two of the indictment charged thirty-six defendants with substantive RICO violations, including murders, witness intimidation, conspiracies to murder, and narcotics-related offenses. Count three of the indictment charged Defendants with conspiracy to distribute illicit substances across various locations. The government consolidated these unconnected criminal acts into one indictment and one trial, arguing that each act was committed to gain power, control, and wealth for El Rukn. Several defendants filed motions to sever the indictment pursuant to Rule 8(b) or, in the alternative, Rule 14 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.