Criminal Law Keyed to Johnson
People v. Jennings
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Sentry Armored Courier Corporation (Sentry) transported and stored large cash sums and performed related services for clients. John Jennings and other officers of Sentry (Defendants), as well as John Finnerty (Defendant), a cashier at the Hudson Valley National Bank, were indicted on several counts of second-degree grand larceny and misapplication of property. First, in a repurchase-agreement scheme, Sentry would perform a money-counting service for a client, Chemical Bank (Chemical), and then deposit the money with Finnerty along with the right to invest the money, which was secured by A-rated bonds. After 72 hours, Finnerty would then transfer the original amount to Chemical, leaving the interest in Sentry’s account. As a result, Sentry gained a total of about $17,000 in interest. Second, in a compensatory-balance matter, Jennings took approximately $100,000 from Chemical’s inventory with Sentry and deposited the money into a compensatory-balance account at Citibank. When Sentry tried to withdraw the funds, Citibank refused and froze the account. Sentry returned the inventory to Chemical with a shortage of $97,000. Third, in a misappropriation of insurance proceeds, an insurer had sent Sentry a check representing payment for losses suffered by three of Sentry’s clients due to an armed car robbery. Jennings reimbursed one of those clients for the loss but did not distribute the remainder of the proceeds to the other two clients, instead keeping the excess for himself. All counts were dismissed by the trial court, and those dismissals were later upheld by the appellate division. The State appealed.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.