Criminal Law Keyed to Johnson
State v. Bowens
Under New Jersey law, a homicide is murder when committed purposely or knowingly, and a homicide is aggravated manslaughter when committed under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to human life. The statutory definition of self-defense was amended to establish an objective standard under which the use of force is justifiable if the defendant reasonably believes that such force is immediately necessary to protect against the use of unlawful force. Anthony Rivers (Defendant) argued with a man, who picked up a knife and threatened to stab Rivers. When the man moved away, Rivers reached for a knife. When the man approached again, Rivers stabbed and killed the man, fearing for his own life. At trial, the court refused to instruct the jury on imperfect self-defense and instructed the jury on reckless manslaughter instead. The jury convicted Rivers of aggravated manslaughter. In a separate case, Leon Bowens (Defendant) had been threatened with a knife by John Booker on many occasions and knew that Booker was a violent man. One day, Booker approached Bowens, causing Bowens to fear an attack. Bowens showed Booker a knife, and Booker retreated but then approached again. Believing that Booker was going to stab him, Bowens stabbed Booker. At trial, the court refused to instruct the jury on imperfect self-defense and instructed the jury on murder and complete self-defense. The jury found Bowens guilty of first-degree murder. The appellate court reversed, finding that the trial court had erred in not charging the jury on the manslaughter offenses. The prosecution appealed. Rivers’s and Bowens’s cases were consolidated on appeal.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.